Please suggest Life Stories that you would like to be created or merged

Potential new LS: Tom BAGSHAW 7575414 Lance Corpl.R.A.O.C

.Absent Voters List autumn 1921
https://search.livesofthefirstworldwar.org/record?id=bl%2fer%2fd25%2ffmp000001133%2f0566&parentid=bl%2fer%2fd25%2ffmp000001133%2f0566&highlights=%22%22

Got to admit that given the date and a seven digit # starting with '75' I suspect a post-war soldier, at least at this date

0 votes
Vote
Sign in
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
or sign in with
  • facebook
  • google
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    R Bagshaw shared this idea  ·   ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    2 comments

    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      Submitting...
      • R Bagshaw commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Yes, I do think it is the same man. An excellent spot by you! Always good to have a fresh set of eyes look at things. :-) I did know about the post-war "75" digit service numbers but the GWF is a great place to help research :-) Thank you. :-) :-)

      • Jane Dickson commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Hi
        I do think 1921 is rather too late as the only evidence from which to create a new life story, but if you check https://livesofthefirstworldwar.org/lifestory/122792 and look at the Absent Vote List entry for that Thomas Bagshaw, you will find a man of the same name at the same address whose service progressed from the Northumberland Fusiliers via the Labour Corps to the RAOC, in which he was a Lance Corporal. I have found the following snippet on https://www.greatwarforum.org/topic/267442-ordnance-corps-army-numbers/
        "Seven-figure numbers were introduced in about 1921-22 to be unique across the Army. Each regiment or corps was allocated its own block of numbers, RAOC numbers all beginning 75."
        In other words, Thomas Bagshaw #S/10188 could well have become Thomas Bagshaw #7575414. Do you agree he is likely to be the right man?
        Best wishes
        Jane

      Feedback and Knowledge Base